Saturday, February 2, 2008

When is too much profit really too much profit?

If you are an American taxpayer and you read a story like the one below, you should be incensed. Granted that the goal of any corporation is to maximize shareholder wealth, runaway profit should be illegal. Many years ago, congress created a special tax for companies that gained extraordinary profits. That rule is, of course, a thing of the past. Read this article regarding the profits of ExxonMobil and Chevron. Check out the highlighted areas and we will talk later...

Exxon Mobil's Profit in 2007 Tops $40 Billion
By Steven MufsonWashington Post Staff WriterSaturday, February 2, 2008

Buoyed by soaring crude oil prices, Exxon Mobil announced yesterday that it set new records for U.S. quarterly and annual corporate profits in 2007, and Chevron, the nation's second-largest oil company, also reported big gains in earnings.

Exxon broke the record it previously had set for profits by a U.S. corporation, earning $40.6 billion last year. It earned $11.7 billion in the fourth quarter, or $2.13 a share, up 14 percent from the fourth quarter of 2006. Revenue for the quarter rose 30 percent, to $116.64 billion. Exxon's profit for the year came to $4.6 million an hour .

Chevron said its profit rose 29 percent, to $4.9 billion, or $2.32 a share. Chevron's quarterly revenue grew 29 percent, to $61.41 billion. Profits of the five biggest international oil companies have tripled since 2002.

Kenneth P. Cohen, Exxon Mobil's vice president for public affairs, said the earnings reflected the company's "long-term, disciplined approach" and investments made a decade ago when oil prices were low. With mounting exploration costs and increasingly remote oil prospects, Cohen said, the large revenues were needed to meet "the massive scale of the energy challenge before us."

But in Washington, the earnings were seen as outsized. Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), chairman of the Joint Economic Committee, issued a statement saying, "Congratulations to ExxonMobil and Chevron -- for reminding Americans why they cringe every time they pull into a gas station and for reminding Washington why it needs to act swiftly to break our dependence on foreign oil and roll back unnecessary tax incentives for oil companies."

The announcement of record profits came on the same day the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries was meeting in Vienna. The 13-member group, which produces about 40 percent of the world's petroleum, decided to leave its output unchanged despite crude oil prices that continue to hover around $90 a barrel, about 35 percent higher than they were a year ago.
During his visit to Saudi Arabia last month, President Bush urged OPEC to boost production to ease oil prices, but yesterday the group issued a statement saying that current markets, "coupled with the projected economic slow-down," meant that "current OPEC production is sufficient to meet expected demand for the first quarter of the year."

If anything, the group suggested that it might trim production in the coming weeks. Citing "significant uncertainties associated with the projected downturn in the global economy," it said there was a need for "vigilant attention" and that the organization would "take every measure deemed necessary to keep the market stable."

The prospect of stable oil prices at current levels will translate into more big profits for the major international oil companies. Though they are net buyers of crude oil to supply their refineries and retail gasoline stations, the companies also have large amounts of their own crude oil production pegged to world prices.

In the last three months of 2007, Exxon Mobil produced 2.5 million barrels a day of crude oil and natural gas liquids. The figure was down almost 1 percent from the year before because Exxon's operation in Venezuela was nationalized and because, as prices rise, some exporting countries cut Exxon's share of production.

But the drop in volume was more than offset by higher prices. The price of crude oil was $29 a barrel higher than the year before, said Henry Hubble, Exxon Mobil's vice president of investor relations. Even after paying taxes and expenses, Exxon earned $20.97 a barrel in profits on its production, Hubble said.
Exxon boosted capital spending last year to $20.9 billion, up 5 percent from 2006. About three-quarters of that went for oil and gas exploration, with much of the rest for refinery projects. That was still outstripped by the amount of money the company spent to repurchase its own shares. In 2007, Exxon Mobil bought 386 million shares of its common stock at a cost of $31.8 billion. About a tenth of that went into company pension and benefit plans; the rest went toward reducing the number of shares outstanding.

So there you have it. Profits off the scale, maximizing shareholders wealth, and the American people are footitng the bill for it all.

Question: Which presidential candidate will address this wrong?

Answer: None!

Only in America and maybe Britain...

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I recently had the pleasure to participate in an annual CIO conference where one of the Shell CIOs was speaking. What really got me, was that in a room full of CIOs (about 240), there were two man quietly booing while the guy boasted with their great wins(Shells annual earnings were annouced $27.6bn). The rest just sat there looking a bit frustrated. Just thinking about it makes my blood boil.
I wonder what it will take for people to realise that the power is not with those companies but the common man.

jdav007 said...

It really is disgusting to think about it. People will not wake up until its too late...